Topic summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video1,177 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Men's And Boys' Health results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 327 hits. Analysis detected 3,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (14,872 of 23,996 topics). This Men's And Boys' Health is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Men's And Boys' Health
Topic details
Total words: 4,708
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos