Topic summary
⁠88%2 analyzed articles/videos2,339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maternity Care results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 2,395 hits. Analysis detected 9,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,850 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (6,691 of 21,961 topics). This Maternity Care is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Maternity Care
Topic details
Total words: 7,850
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.5%30.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.4%17.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.7%20.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos