Topic summary
89% 33 analyzed articles/videos 12,884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Analysis results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 5,392 hits . Analysis detected 60,930 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,446 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 50% (11,964 of 23,665 topics). This Market Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Market Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 50,446
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score33 analyzed articles50.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst