Topic summary
⁠41%3 analyzed articles/videos3,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marine Ecosystems results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 653 hits. Analysis detected 6,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,760 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (18,370 of 24,575 topics). This Marine Ecosystems is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Marine Ecosystems
Topic details
Total words: 10,760
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos