Topic summary
⁠69%3 analyzed articles/videos1,837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luxury Homes results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 768 hits. Analysis detected 5,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,348 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (15,838 of 24,545 topics). This Luxury Homes is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Luxury Homes
Topic details
Total words: 7,348
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos