Topic summary
64% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,692 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Culture results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,664 hits . Analysis detected 10,193 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,768 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (18,229 of 23,727 topics). This Los Angeles Culture is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Los Angeles Culture
Topic details
Total words: 14,768
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst