Topic summary
64%4 analyzed articles/videos3,692 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Culture results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,664 hits. Analysis detected 10,193 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,768 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (18,229 of 23,727 topics). This Los Angeles Culture is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Los Angeles Culture
Topic details
Total words: 14,768
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate