Topic summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lng Market results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 2,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (7,806 of 22,996 topics). This Lng Market is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Lng Market
Topic details
Total words: 2,592
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.8%13.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos