Author summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Dexter Palmer results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 358 hits . Analysis detected 2,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,470 of 8,557 authors). This Ian Dexter Palmer is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Ian Dexter Palmer
Author details
Total words: 2,592
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.1% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.8% 13.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst