Topic summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video322 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Library Policies results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 350 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (11,911 of 24,545 topics). This Library Policies is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Library Policies
Topic details
Total words: 1,288
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos