Topic summary
⁠55%4 analyzed articles/videos5,813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Exploitation results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,907 hits. Analysis detected 18,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,304 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (19,394 of 24,545 topics). This Labor Exploitation is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Labor Exploitation

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles26.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos