Topic summary
76%3 analyzed articles/videos1,385 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kentucky Politics results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 980 hits. Analysis detected 5,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,540 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 54% (11,462 of 24,545 topics). This Kentucky Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Kentucky Politics
Topic details
Total words: 5,540
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.7%17.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate