Topic summary
⁠89%4 analyzed articles/videos1,725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Sanctions results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 1,096 hits. Analysis detected 6,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,586 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (7,851 of 23,096 topics). This Iran Sanctions is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Iran Sanctions
Topic details
Total words: 5,586
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.6%19.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos