Topic summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos1,231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Internships results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 519 hits. Analysis detected 3,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,664 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (16,586 of 23,166 topics). This Internships is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Internships
Topic details
Total words: 6,664
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos