Topic summary
83% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Internet Regulation results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 4,529 hits . Analysis detected 29,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,276 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 48% (11,719 of 22,261 topics). This Internet Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Internet Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 24,276
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles24.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.7% 18.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst