Topic summary
57% 27 analyzed articles/videos 11,170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Agreements results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 5,361 hits . Analysis detected 39,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,210 analyzed words across 27 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (20,767 of 24,564 topics). This International Agreements is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. International Agreements
Topic details
Total words: 57,210
Article count: 27
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score27 analyzed articles57.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst