Topic summary
69% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indiana Fever results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 1,638 hits . Analysis detected 8,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,298 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,929 of 22,261 topics). This Indiana Fever is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Indiana Fever
Topic details
Total words: 9,298
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst