Topic summary
75% 24 analyzed articles/videos 20,590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigrant Rights results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 8,378 hits . Analysis detected 78,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 91,935 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 25% (17,908 of 23,738 topics). This Immigrant Rights is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. Immigrant Rights
Topic details
Total words: 91,935
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score24 analyzed articles91.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst