Topic summary
⁠75%3 analyzed articles/videos2,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Tactics results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 961 hits. Analysis detected 8,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,104 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (13,267 of 24,545 topics). This Ice Tactics is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Ice Tactics
Topic details
Total words: 9,104
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos