Author summary
70%1 analyzed article/video1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Platoff results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 510 hits. Analysis detected 3,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 66% (3,176 of 9,122 authors). This Emma Platoff is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Emma Platoff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
66%Emma Platoff (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.3%7.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 5.9%5.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.9%3.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Composition/Division: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos