Topic summary
92% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Killings results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 2,557 hits . Analysis detected 19,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,228 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 57% (10,569 of 24,545 topics). This Ice Killings is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Ice Killings
Topic details
Total words: 15,228
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst