Topic summary
⁠37%3 analyzed articles/videos3,197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Arrests results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 872 hits. Analysis detected 8,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,408 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (19,478 of 22,501 topics). This Ice Arrests is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.4% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos