Author summary
38% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,732 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Larkins results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Slippery Slope , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 892 hits . Analysis detected 5,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,928 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 18% (7,013 of 8,521 authors). This Laura Larkins is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Laura Larkins
Author details
Total words: 10,928
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst