Topic summary
⁠23%2 analyzed articles/videos919 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Housing Costs results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 449 hits. Analysis detected 3,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,313 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (18,909 of 24,718 topics). This Housing Costs is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Housing Costs
Topic details
Total words: 8,313
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos