Topic summary
90% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,711 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Home Security results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 4,540 hits . Analysis detected 18,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,438 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 51% (11,113 of 22,421 topics). This Home Security is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Home Security
Topic details
Total words: 18,438
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 24.6% 24.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst