Author summary
82% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler Lacoma results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 4,031 hits . Analysis detected 17,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,236 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,554 of 9,224 authors). This Tyler Lacoma is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Tyler Lacoma
Author details
Total words: 21,236
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles21.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 19.0% 19.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 19.0%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst