Topic summary
97% 3 analyzed articles/videos 8,307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Home & Garden results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Bandwagon , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 59.5% saturation with 17,749 hits . Analysis detected 45,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,814 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,544 of 22,420 topics). This Home & Garden is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Home & Garden
Topic details
Total words: 29,814
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.8% percentile 3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles29.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 59.5% 59.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 59.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst