Author summary
75% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Irene S. Levine results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 1,353 hits . Analysis detected 5,995 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,956 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (3,053 of 9,142 authors). This Irene S. Levine is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Irene S. Levine
Author details
Total words: 6,956
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 16.1% 16.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 19.4% 19.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 19.4%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 16.1%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst