Topic summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hollywood Budgets results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 558 hits. Analysis detected 2,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (9,405 of 22,652 topics). This Hollywood Budgets is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Hollywood Budgets
Topic details
Total words: 2,960
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.9%18.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos