Topic summary
⁠84%3 analyzed articles/videos2,046 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hindu Nationalism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,455 hits. Analysis detected 9,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,184 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (11,645 of 24,545 topics). This Hindu Nationalism is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Hindu Nationalism
Topic details
Total words: 8,184
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.8%17.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos