Topic summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video1,289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heliot Ramos results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 3,335 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (15,681 of 22,946 topics). This Heliot Ramos is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Heliot Ramos
Topic details
Total words: 5,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos