Topic summary
⁠69%4 analyzed articles/videos1,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hedge Funds results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 660 hits. Analysis detected 5,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,304 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (8,146 of 22,556 topics). This Hedge Funds is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Hedge Funds
Topic details
Total words: 5,304
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.2%11.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.4%12.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos