Topic summary
⁠47%2 analyzed articles/videos1,403 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Healthy-Living results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 574 hits. Analysis detected 3,634 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,612 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (12,618 of 22,261 topics). This Healthy-Living is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Healthy-Living
Topic details
Total words: 5,612
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos