Topic summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Healthcare Ratings results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 1,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (11,443 of 22,261 topics). This Healthcare Ratings is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Healthcare Ratings
Topic details
Total words: 2,080
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%Straw Man: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos