Author summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin Public Radio results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 140 hits . Analysis detected 1,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,907 of 8,559 authors). This Wisconsin Public Radio is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group. Wisconsin Public Radio
Author details
Total words: 2,080
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% No True Scotsman: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.1% Straw Man: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst