Topic summary
⁠75%5 analyzed articles/videos1,367 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Tech results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 635 hits. Analysis detected 4,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,602 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (11,212 of 23,669 topics). This Health Tech is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Health Tech

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos