Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Government Rebates results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Special Pleading, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 261 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,838 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Government Rebates is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Government Rebates
Topic details
Total words: 1,838
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Special Pleading: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos