Topic summary
86% 20 analyzed articles/videos 34,264 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Economy results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 8,528 hits . Analysis detected 74,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 122,585 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (22,736 of 24,545 topics). This Global Economy is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Global Economy
Topic details
Total words: 122,585
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.4% percentile 1.1% BS Score20 analyzed articles122.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst