Topic summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos4,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geopolitical Influence results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 2,398 hits. Analysis detected 15,777 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,464 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (16,148 of 24,545 topics). This Geopolitical Influence is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Geopolitical Influence
Topic details
Total words: 17,464
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos