Author summary
42% 1 analyzed article/video 2,624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalia Cote-Muñoz results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 707 hits . Analysis detected 4,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (7,443 of 8,903 authors). This Natalia Cote-Muñoz is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group. Natalia Cote-Muñoz
Author details
Total words: 10,496
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst