Topic summary
⁠58%3 analyzed articles/videos1,802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Generosity results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 728 hits. Analysis detected 5,234 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,561 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (15,184 of 24,545 topics). This Generosity is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Generosity
Topic details
Total words: 6,561
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos