Topic summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Generative AI Applications results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Overconfidence Bias, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 378 hits. Analysis detected 2,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (4,388 of 23,403 topics). This Generative AI Applications is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Generative AI Applications
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,056
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 15.5%15.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.0%10.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos