Topic summary
55% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gaming Technology results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 933 hits . Analysis detected 8,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,050 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (14,770 of 23,346 topics). This Gaming Technology is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Gaming Technology
Topic details
Total words: 11,050
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst