Topic summary
75% 18 analyzed articles/videos 12,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Game Development results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 5,661 hits . Analysis detected 48,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 48,055 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 40% (14,439 of 23,903 topics). This Game Development is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Game Development
Topic details
Total words: 48,055
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score18 analyzed articles48.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst