Topic summary
⁠100%2 analyzed articles/videos1,044 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Future Of Marketing results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 1,153 hits. Analysis detected 7,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,176 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (4,382 of 22,605 topics). This Future Of Marketing is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Future Of Marketing
Topic details
Total words: 4,176
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 27.6%27.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 18.3%18.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.7%19.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos