Topic summary
⁠53%3 analyzed articles/videos1,968 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Free Streaming results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,051 hits. Analysis detected 5,760 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,872 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (14,831 of 24,564 topics). This Free Streaming is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Free Streaming
Topic details
Total words: 7,872
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos