Author summary
61% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Jones results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Overconfidence Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 1,008 hits . Analysis detected 4,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,756 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,504 of 8,727 authors). This Jacob Jones is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Jacob Jones
Author details
Total words: 4,756
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 21.2% 21.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 21.2%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Tu Quoque: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst