Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fort Lauderdale results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 242 faulty-reasoning hits from 932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (7,723 of 23,197 topics). This Fort Lauderdale is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Fort Lauderdale
Topic details
Total words: 932
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles932 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 1.4%1.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos