Author summary
7%6 analyzed articles/videos822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Batchelor results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 756 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,984 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (8,040 of 9,073 authors). This Amanda Batchelor is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Amanda Batchelor
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
12%Amanda Batchelor (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,984
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510011.4% percentile
1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.8%0.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate