Topic summary
22% 1 analyzed article/video 1,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food And Beverage Industry results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 397 hits . Analysis detected 3,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (17,460 of 23,519 topics). This Food And Beverage Industry is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Food And Beverage Industry
Topic details
Total words: 7,068
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst