Topic summary
⁠97%2 analyzed articles/videos665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Access results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 3,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,300 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,046 of 23,401 topics). This Food Access is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Food Access
Topic details
Total words: 2,300
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.7% percentile
4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 17.0%17.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.1%11.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos